Search for: "Davis v. Warden" Results 1 - 20 of 32
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Dec 2014, 11:30 am by Kent Scheidegger
  Ron Davis is now the warden of San Quentin and thus is automatically substituted as the respondent for the departed Kevin Chappell. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 11:30 am by Alex Loomis
  The Majority Opinion In the Court’s view, Bivens and the two cases extending it—Davis v. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 11:30 am by Alex Loomis
  The Majority Opinion In the Court’s view, Bivens and the two cases extending it—Davis v. [read post]
3 Feb 2017, 1:37 pm
Pickett gave Warden Pinales the name of Seth Winkler as a possible suspect. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 5:00 pm
Davis Issue: Must Miranda warnings be given before any person so detained may be asked any questions? [read post]
6 May 2010, 7:39 am by Meg Martin
Davis, JudgeRepresenting Appellant (Plaintiff): Louis D. [read post]
18 Mar 2012, 6:43 pm by Orin Kerr
Under the latest good-faith exception case, Davis v. [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 1:00 pm by Jon Sands
Davis, Acting Warden of San Quentin State Prison, Nos. 09-99012, 09-99013 (Ikuta with NR Smith and Murguia) --- Finding that a reasoned opinion of the California Supreme Court regarding a California death-row prisoner's claim of penalty-phase ineffective assistance was entitled to deference under AEDPA, the panel reversed the district court's grant of relief from a death sentence. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 4:55 am by Timothy P. Flynn
  Last year it was Warden Berguhis v Thompkins; this year it's Rick Bryant's case.Kinda sad that we're known for the laws that get spawned from these murders.http://www.clarkstonlegal.com/info@clarkstonlegal.com [read post]
12 Mar 2011, 7:18 am by Timothy P. Flynn, Esq.
  Last year it was Warden Berguhis v Thompkins; this year it's Rick Bryant's case.Kinda sad that we're known for the laws that get spawned from these murders.http://www.clarkstonlegal.com/info@clarkstonlegal.com [read post]
28 Jul 2007, 9:32 am
The state court's resolution of this claim represents an unreasonable application of Supreme Court Confrontation Clause jurisprudence, most notably Davis v. [read post]